
What follows is an article contributed by controversial figure David Irving. The Holocaust Denial Conference, hosted by Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, met with outrage from world leaders. Attendees included many of the world's most notorious Holocaust denial figures including former KuKluxKlan Imperial Wizard David Duke. It cast doubt on what most historians accept as incontrovertible fact: that the Nazis systematically executed six million Jewish people in World War II. Controversial historian David Irving was serving the final days of a jail term in Austria for violating that country's laws prohibiting Holocaust denial. Irving maintains he is a legitimate historian and laws against Holocaust denial violate free speech and inhibit scholarship. His critics say it's thinly-veiled anti-Semitism.
Here, in his first interview since he was released December 21, 2006, Irving commented on the Tehran conference. He also talks about being imprisoned for his beliefs, saying the worst thing was being denied a pen and paper and being away from his daughter. Despite the ongoing threat of new charges, Irving remains passionate and vocal about his right to choose how he writes his history and discusses how his work will be viewed by generations to come.
In 1964 I decided to write the biography of Adolf Hitler based entirely on original, primary sources. In France, legislation makes it a criminal offense to dispute the facts of the Nuremburg trial in 1945. In Germany, the law is called Defaming the Memory of the Dead, and in Austria, the law is called The Reactivation of the Nazi Party.
In Austria last year, 35 people were put on trial for this offense, 12 were acquitted. If you're a German or an Austrian historian, you're subjected to these laws, and it's going to damage your credibility, not to mention 400 days in solitary confinement. For me it's cost 300,000 Euros in lost revenue and legal expenses. We lost our home.
The Tehran Holocaust Denial Conference is about geopolitics instead of history. I spent the last eight years researching Reichsfuhrer-SS Heinrich Himmler and it's become increasingly evident to me that he was the principal architect of the Holocaust along with Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister and Martin Bormann, the Nazi Party secretary.
My reputation has come under foul attack ever since 1959. I tried to defend my reputation in 2000 with a libel action in England. It was disastrous because my enemies poured $13 million into the High Court in London to defend the person I was suing. It's a very one-sided battle. I'm entirely self-supported. I don't have academic backing, I don't have university backing, I don't have family money.
The worst part about being in prison was being away from family and the prison authorities wouldn't let me have ink and paper initially. I wrote 4,000 pages by hand while I was there. I have them with me now -- 2,000 pages on memoirs and 2,000 on Himmler. It wasn't wasted time.
Need a short url to tell a friend or add to twitter
http://orato.com/9152
Comments
No historians dispute what really happened to the Jews during WWII, the forensic evidence for this is immeasurable, the credible eyewitnesses abundant. To deny this would be like denying that WWII occurred, at all.
What is disputed is the history added onto WWII via these very Medieval Nuremberg Trials where torture and threats of death were common against defendants who refused to sign confessions written up for them, based upon the rumors promoted by Zionists during the war, rumors similar to those during the first world war, the holocaust industry, itself, acknowledging there is no forensic evidence to support these charges, the Nazis cleverly covering it all up.
The "reality" of this great calamity also served to create the needed sympathy in the West to accept and promote the creation of a Jewish state, and the instability it would create, viewed also as just another European colonial adventure, the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, something the West had no stomach for, anymore.
As this story is discussed, it may be necessary to restate the ground rules governing feedback to Orato. One of Orato's foremost goals is to promote and foster freedom of expression for all citizens. We welcome feedback to our stories, and would like to remind our correspondents that we require that feedback to abide by laws governing public expression. And to create an atmosphere that encourages all viewpoints we ask that correspondents avoid incendiary language. Posts that don't respect these two requirements will be edited or removed. Thank you.
Paul Sullivan,
Editor-In-Chief
http://www.filmkalesi.com/
http://www.kopma.net/
http://www.tatilotel.org/
http://www.tatilresimleri.net/
http://www.guzelokey.com/
http://www.pierrecassi.com/
http://www.filmportali.net/
Please Login or Register to post a comment on this article