Okay, so no. I don't think NASCAR, as a sport, has a drug problem. With Aaron Fike's interview (which, by the way, who paid him to come out with that mess? Classless), coming out and Kevin Harvick, Tony Stewart and others speaking about drug testing, or the lack there of, it's impossible for me to ignore this topic - even if it's touchy and I'm not quite sure I have a set, secure opinion on it. So here's a breakdown:
- Drugs are bad. And they should be banned in any sport, household and/or business. Obviously.
-Driving (or doing anything else in sports or life) while under the influence of any drug is wrong.
-We are not, unlike baseball, talking about any performance enhancing drugs, if there is such a thing in racing.
-We are also not, unlike baseball, talking about a huge outbreak of drug usage.
-We have, in the past, seen NASCAR ban drivers, some indefinitely (I'll get to this in a sec), for the use of drugs.
-We know that NASCAR hasn't tested some drivers that have been in the sport for ten years and more.
-NASCAR's drug policy is based on whether or not they have suspicion that said driver has been using drugs.
So there are the facts. And here is what I think. I think drug testing should be mandatory, no questions asked. It should be random but every driver should be tested. Being on drugs on the racetrack, much like everything else in life, is dangerous and life threatening. Not only for that reason, but because like I mentioned above, these aren't performance enhancers. These are drugs that are for highs and are being abused, which means that this person(s) have a problem and these problems need to be addressed. Only once by Dale Earnhardt, Jr.




Comments
Re: NASCAR's Drug Problem
By Melkor, April 17, 2008 at 10:25Another great article Brandy. My two cents.
Frankly, I’m a libertarian, and most of my opinions are formed from this position. What anyone chooses to do with themselves (and if it does not encroach on someone else’s pursuits – the only reason we need a ‘state’ at all) is their business and no one else’s. Paternalism really bothers me – I am not a child and I absolutely do not require anyone telling me what I should do and not do. Leave me alone and I’ll leave you alone.
The only problem to my mind would be drivers getting stoned or drunk on race day (well, what they choose to do after the race doesn’t bother, concern or affect me one iota actually) only because they place other drivers at risk of serious injury or worse. However, I would EXPECT Kurt Busch to get sloshed every Sunday night on Miller Lite (not that they have anything to celebrate this season). I think that it would be EXPECTED for Clint Bowyer to line up shots for his crew after a race. I don’t think anyone would have a serious issue with this (even the ‘nose pokers’ – my term for those who interject at every opportunity). But smoke a joint or do something else that affects absolutely no one and harms no one (expect the ‘nose pokers’) – for some reason they become horrible, broken human beings, in need of ‘improvement’ and ‘fixing’.
And please spare me the readymade arguments which I’ve already heard and dismissed. The truth is this – Drugs are illegal for only two reasons. The first is racism – drugs are an excellent way to marginalize people who have nothing to begin with. Also, the ‘War on Drugs’ is merely epiphenomenal of big business in competition (not that there is anything wrong with that per say, but let’s not be so naive to make it some sort of moral issue because it is plainly not so) and in fact we can point to the sponsor of the 24 car for most of this nonsense (notice you don’t see any hemp rope anymore although it is much much stronger than it’s synthetic counterpart?). The most bothersome of these anti-drug messages (more fallacies) is the typical ‘we can’t have our children exposed to this filth can we’? Yes we can – your children are not made of glass and are much smarter than you give them credit for. And they ARE exposed to this stuff at every turn anyway – ignoring this issue doesn’t help (if any help is actually needed).
So, to my mind, nothing actually needs to be done. Heroin and driving is and should be considered criminal behaviour (only because of the harm subjected to the other drivers) and those involved should be dealt with in this arena. And it should be made clear that anyone who might tip a few back before a race will also be dealt with by the state. Anything else is punitive and none of our business.
Re: NASCAR's Drug Problem
By luyen, April 17, 2008 at 13:13Is it possible to get sloshed on Miller Lite? Yes i know i'm totally off topic, but since Nascar doesn't interest me, i thought i'd post on beer instead.
I had Coors light a few months ago, I thought they had given me tap water if it weren't for the shiny silver label. Hmm, feel free to ignore this ;-)
Re: NASCAR's Drug Problem
By Melkor, April 17, 2008 at 13:22Actually Luyen, when you’re right you’re right. I forget not everyone has the constitution of a 4 year old child (like me).
Re: NASCAR's Drug Problem
By luyen, April 17, 2008 at 14:04Haha, that's funny ;-) Good one Melkor, actually my alcohol tolerance is quite low...and i don't plan on working on that anytime soon, but I like the "one" beer I drink per week to have some kick to it ;-)