We all have it. Writers call it "inspiration;" police officers call it "hunches" and "gut feelings" and others refer to it as "a sixth sense." The truth is that each and every one of us could be a psychic with the proper training. For the last 30 years, I've been a psychic helping police find missing persons and solve homicides. So far, I've worked on over 500 cases in 38 states and six foreign countries, taught at colleges and universities and written books. Before this, however, I was a skeptic. I didn't believe that people could use their minds to see what happened in the past let alone perceive the future- until I experienced it myself.
I was in my early thirties, working for a large hotel in Florida as the PR and advertising director, when someone asked me to let a psychic rent one of our lecture halls. By then, I was full of prejudices and thought that all psychics were the same sort of people: heavy set fat bluffers with warts or pimples. I didn't want those kinds of people in my hotel, but I finally agreed to meet with her and realizing she was a normal person, I rented her the room. Either she was very powerful or I was very sensitive because my whole body felt like it was vibrating after being with her. Following her presentation, she gave me a book about paranormal phenomena. I'm sure a science fiction book would have been more credible to me! But for some reason, I kept it, and I started reading many other books about parapsychology afterwards.
Two close women friends of mine were also interested in similar areas, specifically in meditation, so we'd get together occasionally to meditate.




Comments
I'm afraid you missed
By John Merrell, April 15, 2007 at 10:12I'm afraid you missed several BIG scoops on this rather vague and very poorly investigated story covering psychic Noreen Renier. A Washington U.S. District court ordered a federal judgment against psychic Noreen Renier in a lawsuit brought by a major skeptic writer --- myself! And just three days after you filed your story, on April 5th, a the same federal court also awarded me costs and fees to be paid by Noreen Renier. The decision to award costs is stunning as they come 22 years after Noreen Renier sued me in a small county court before six jury members and won $25,000.
However the total estimated costs and losses for Noreen Renier following the April 5th order now are estimated to top $127,000 --- with the U.S. District court awarding me a slice of that pie at $39,558.00. Also missing from your story is that the publisher of Renier's book 'A Mind for Murder' halted all further publication of the book in late 2005 just months after it came out --- and that book is the principal source that the court specified in ruling against Noreen Renier for breaching a settlement agreement. The book was banished by Berkley/Penguin books over 16 months ago when the publisher told a judge it was removing it immediately! Where have you been? The book's brief publication period --- and it was brief indeed --- ended back in 2005! The $127,000 in losses and costs for Noreen Renier are estimates based on Renier's own legal fees, plus estimated loss on book revenue since the filing of the lawsuit, plus a loss claim by Renier filed with the court, plus the $39,558 due from Renier to me. Finally, a word to the wise. Renier claimed to have found a crashed plane and stated under oath and before a jury that a survivor of the crash had carried another passenger away from the crash and gone for help. But this never happened and a medical examiner stated that the very man Renier said was alive was killed instantly along with all other passengers! Renier also created a series of fantasy claims about the crash before millions of TV viewers and in her now banished book 'A Mind for Murder'. Dozens of aircrash related psychic claims have been shown as outright fabrications and the relative of one of the passengers noted her statement of finding the plane is a "monsterous lie." If you want the real story --- from REAL people who know what REALLY happened --- clearly skip Cecilia Jamasmie. She's way out of the loop. I'd encourage any reader who likes a mystery and wants to read about an incredible deception and charade to take a look at www.amindformurder.com -Thank you. http://www.amindformurder.com
This material is sanctioned for release by John Merrell and all key federal court orders are shown on the website.
Well, John, as you
By Cecilia, May 17, 2007 at 16:03Well, John, as you acknowledged, I filed the story told by Noreen before what you're referring to happened. It seems you have enough material to write your own version of this story, so I encourage you to go ahead and do it, instead of just sitting at the fence complaining about what could have been written.
Sincerely,
Cecilia Jamasmie
Actually your story appeared
By John Merrell, June 28, 2007 at 21:57Actually your story appeared April 2, 2007. It was four months earlier that the U.S. District court placed a judgment against Noreen Renier with the judge stating in public records --- and a statement widely available on various internet web sites that ". . . the record before the court shows that it is impossible that Ms. Renier breached the agreement in this case without some level of fault. She knew or should have known of the agreement, and breached it nonetheless." On April 5th the judge simply awarded the damages. Additionally the concerns regarding Renier's claims behind finding the crashed aircraft were also widely available for more than a year before you wrote your article. So the fact is, you selected to write about the paranormal without bothering to even do a basic fact check beforehand.
Anyone who 'Googles' Noreen Renier can see there is plenty of info directing them to concerns. What you did is simply entertainment writing rather than balanced journalism. Even now, after being made aware of the facts you make no effort to expand on what you wrote. So in addition to entertainment writing it appears you prefer only entertainment writing that does not reflect all sides of a story. In any case for more than 16 months many of my comments are posted about Renier's claims (and some of the background behind)at www.amindformurder.com for those who want more than entertainment. There facts are posted for all to see and any comments can be submitted. So clearly I never sit on a fence.
Orato is about the voice of
By Heather Wallace, June 29, 2007 at 06:52Orato is about the voice of the person telling his or her story. Ms. Renier had a story to tell, and so this is her version of events. To get the other side of the story, we would ask that you post your own, and it does sound as though you have a very different version. If you would like to arrange an interview, please contact me at heather@orato.com.
At the time Cecilia Jamasmie became aware of your comments here, she had already stopped working for Orato. So, it's not up to her to fill in the information you speak of. I'd be happy to help.
heather wallace
senior editor
orato.com
I think the above
By John Merrell, June 29, 2007 at 23:08I think the above back-and-forth is enough for readers. If anyone wishes more --- including court testimony statements by both myself and Noreen Renier --- as well as a complete background profile on Noreen Renier they can see www.amindformurder.com
I appreciate the offer, but this should complete this string.
During 1985, John D. Merrell
By Hawk, September 2, 2007 at 04:37During 1985, John D. Merrell of Beaverton, Oregon, published an article in the Newsletter of the Northwest Skeptics (a group of which Merrell was co-founder) questioning Noreen's background credentials and what he claimed were "fraudulent claims" of psychic ability. Northwest Skeptics is a group dedicated to combating pseudoscience and uncovering false claims of paranormal phenomena, with loose ties to the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. The Newsletter was mailed to newspapers, broadcast media, and police departments.
Noreen filed a defamation suit against Merrell, claiming that the Newsletter had damaged her reputation as a practicing psychic. The case was heard in September 1986, when Noreen testified that she lost at least one lecturing job with Oregon State Police trainees because of Merrell's article. The suit claimed that Merrell's statements "held the plaintiff up to public ridicule, humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of reputation causing her to suffer loss of self-esteem, mental anguish, humiliation, and loss of reputation regarding her occupation." The jury's verdict was that Merrell knew that at least some of his story was false or written with a reckless disregard for the truth. Noreen was awarded $25,000 damages.
The case was something of a landmark in the present battle between skeptics and psychics. Militant skeptics claim that belief in paranormal phenomena is unscientific and socially irresponsible and must be exposed as pseudoscience or fraud. Some skeptics have performed a useful service in joining with psychical researchers in exposing a variety of fraudulent claims; others have been irresponsible in attempting to use guilt by association to brand all psychics and all claims of the paranormal as frauds.
Source of Information: Answers.com research tool. The link is as follows:
http://www.answers.com/Noreen%20Renier
The first part of the
By Hawk, September 2, 2007 at 04:39The first part of the article I had just submitted is as follows:
Contemporary professional psychic with ten years' experience as a teacher, investigator, and lecturer. Originally from Massachusetts, Noreen lived in Florida for eighteen years, working in advertising and public relations. In 1976, she was introduced to meditation and discovered a psychic ability. She submitted her gift to scientific testing and research, working with the Psychical Research Foundation in Durham, North Carolina, and the Department of Personality Studies at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. Her experiments in archaeology and anthropology with Dr. David Jones at the University of Central Florida were reported in his book Visions of Time (1979).
Noreen became a consultant to law enforcement agencies, and she claims to have worked on more than a hundred cases. She briefly had a weekly call-in radio program "In Touch with Noreen" (1980-82). In 1984, she began work on a book about her experiences, returning to Orlando in 1985 to continue teaching, consultation, and lecturing.
Same source page. Copy paste the website link to see. The link is as follows:
http://www.answers.com/Noreen%20Renier
bye bye now, enjoy your day/evening
Hi Noreen and Cecilia, this
By Richard Day Gore, April 2, 2007 at 12:42Hi Noreen and Cecilia, this is fascinating stuff. I know a psychic quite well and have seen first hand many times that some things that can't be explained by conventional means are no less real.
Richard Day Gore
For many years I was a
By Cecilia, April 2, 2007 at 14:25For many years I was a skeptical, but a series of interesting and inexplicable events made me change my mind. Now I'm certain that if human beings knew how to use their mind fully, we'd be living in a very different world. I'm not sure if better, but certainly special.
Cecilia Jamasmie
Associate Editor, Orato.com
Re: I'm A Real Life Psychic Detective
By John Merrell, December 22, 2007 at 22:15For the first time tonight I see the postings of "Hawk" --- some three months after his posting.
Whoever he is, unfortunately his facts are badly wrong. I did not publish my remarks concerning Noreen Renier in 1985 in a newsletter of Northwest Skeptics, but rather in a letter which was never sent out on the Northwest Skeptics mailing list. Had it been it would have been sent as any of our newsletters were --- to more than 250 members. Rather approximately 16 copies of a 4-page letter were mailed out primarily to those mentioned in the letter, which was never "published" other than by several Xerox copies.
Renier's claim of a loss of a teaching job was shown to be an unfounded exaggeration as she never had a confirmed teaching job and her "loss" occurred based on a letter she claims mentioned her by name, but in fact was written and confirmed as being months before she identified herself or was known to me. She has also claimed to have been fired by the University of Virginia for a teaching job and held a "adjunct faculty" position there. But she was never a faculty member, an associate faculty member or a faculty assistant. And therefore she was never capable of being fired as she was never an employee on the campus.
Hawk claims "The jury's verdict was that Merrell knew that at least some of his story was false or written with a reckless disregard for the truth." In fact the jury made no determination and made no comment, and only awarded general damages. And they did so after a witness and Noreen Renier testified to a series of falsehoods that would not be revealed as untrue until about 5 years after the trial. The web site www.amindformurder.com covers these facts including court filings made in years after the original 1986 trial.
While Noreen was awarded $25,000 damages which I paid, "Hawk" somehow fails to mention from this small county court in 1985 a U.S. federal court in April 2004 awarded me $39,558 against Renier. The tables have turned. And with interest and new collection costs that figure is now approaching $65,000 which I have asked to be granted. Renier is currently attempting her second bankruptcy but a U.S. Bankrutpcy Court in Charlottesville Virginia has postponed her bankruptcy approval pending inquiries into whether she failed to report significant income and assets. That assessment is likely to be concluded in early 2008.
People such as "Hawk" should get their facts straight before posting. Anyone seeking the truth should examine www.amindformurder.com I believe you'll agree "Hawk" doesn't want you know all the facts about Noreen Renier, including even her own testimony nor court conclusions ---- all of which are posted for the public to make their own determination on..