Current Events

Iraq War's 5th Anniversary: The Legacy Of Madmen

Iraq child

"...at least we could walk around without the constant fear of being shot or blown to pieces."


Speak to the average Iraqi citizen today and you’ll hear the same stories, "we were poor and oppressed under Saddam, but at least we could walk around without the constant fear of being shot or blown to pieces." '
By Citizen Correspondent Roli Rivelino
Date Posted: 03/17/08
Reader Rating: rating

This week the Iraq war moves into its sixth year; five years ago, George W. Bush and Tony Blair fooled the majority of the world into thinking that not only was this war necessary, it was winnable.

In America, the US public was led to believe that Saddam Hussein was responsible for (amongst other things) the 9/11 tragedies, in the UK the buzz phrase was weapons of mass destruction. Intelligence reports before the war hinted at the fact that Saddam’s capabilities when it came to making war were seriously depleted, years of harsh economic sanctions, put in place by the US after Gulf War I had crippled the Iraqi economy.

Indeed, it was estimated before the war that around 500,000 Iraqi children had died of starvation as a direct result of the sanctions. Speak to the average Iraqi citizen today and you’ll hear the same stories, "we were poor and oppressed under Saddam, but at least we could walk around without the constant fear of being shot or blown to pieces."

Politics has always been about opportunism and band wagon jumping, if a politician sees an opportunity to win favour (and votes) then that is pretty much all it will take for said politician to get his media and PR team on the case. Tony Blair saw this opportunity in the aftermath of the twin towers attacks, the buzz phrase that would emerge from the ashes of the stricken buildings was; ’war on terror’. The phrase is classical Orwellian newspeak, it can be expanded or reduced to take in whatever situation the speaker of the phrase wishes and its meaning can’t be specified in any true terms. The phrase isn’t war on terrorists because that war would be easy to measure in real terms, i.e. how many terrorists you kill or foil.

For Tony Blair, the war on terror gave him the global soapbox that would cement his place in history.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 next








Tags:

Comments

Re: Iraq War's 5th Anniversary: The Legacy Of Madmen

By luyen, March 20, 2008 at 00:01

This war is wrong on so many fronts, from the initial reasoning, to the preparation, it's inevitable that everything in between will be messed up, but I think when you're in the middle of a mess, you can't just leave - like it or not, they have to stay until there's some semblance of political and military stability, by someone, if not them.

I have no doubt that civil war will erupt in Iraq without U.S forces there, as there will be a vacuum of power, and even more civilians will have died. Was Iraq better off before the U.S. invaded? Probably, depends who you ask...they traded one bad situation for something potentially worse that's for sure.

It's a hot potato, and no leader wants this on their plate - the next president will inherit this huge mess, and pulling troops out might make the mess even bigger, maybe not for americans, but for iraqis who have been left holding the short end of the stick since day 1.

Re: Iraq War's 5th Anniversary: The Legacy Of Madmen

By Heather Wallace, March 19, 2008 at 11:14

It seems like ages ago now that I sat crying in my living room as I watched the first bombs falling. It seems unbelievable that Bush is still the leader and America is still at war.

End it already.

Editor's Picks

Confusion At The Convention

By Citizen Correspondent Eric Mack
I thought covering the Democratic National Convention in my hometown would be a breeze.... Full Story »