This is Argentina, a very fashion-conscious and image-savvy nation still rife with machismo. Unlike Clinton, Fernandez de Kirchner has sternly avoided policy discussions, and did so right through the campaign. She never had to earn the party nomination - it was simply handed to her.
Her support comes mainly from the poorly-educated lower-class, people who are happy to have a job. More educated people expect her - like any leader - to address semi-complicated issues like inflation, foreign debt and public policy. She never has. Cristina’s fans are just seeing it through the “are things better now than they were four years ago we her husband was elected” lens.
She has inherited a nation with many problems, mainly a looming energy crisis and sky-rocketing inflation that her husband’s government has been accused of trying to cover up.
As for the “first woman president” issue, yes it is a landmark event. And Cristina’s promising the bring her female perspective forward. In her acceptance speech, she said she carries the responsibility of her gender with pride. In Argentina, gender relations are tricky. Women will have more power, which is considered good. But they must also look very good to be considered worthy of leadership.
*****
Read Christie's blog at www.patagonialiving.com
If you enjoyed this story, you may also enjoy Election Blunders In Argentina



Comments
Re: Queen Cristina: Image Vs. Substance And The Hillary Clinton
By luyen, November 1, 2007 at 15:27The great thing about gender equality, is that women or men presidents can both fail equally, and in wonderful fashion. History has proven that gender doesn't seem to alter the political machine in too varying of a degree.