Current Events

Advice To Canada's Politicians Now Using The Komagata Maru Incident To Get Votes: Do Your Homework

The Japanese cheap labourer incident in 1907 was a cause of the Komagata Maru incident in 1914. '
By Citizen Correspondent Dan Murray
Date Posted: 01/25/07
Reader Rating: rating

NDP leader Jack Layton has recently called upon the Harper government to apologize to Canada's Sikhs for the Komagata Maru incident of 1914.

Prime Minister Harper has expressed sentiments similar to those of Mr. Layton.

Before others join them in telling Canadians to once again get on their knees and beg forgiveness, they should all do some serious homework on one of the reasons the Canadian government had for rejecting most of the Sikhs: the cheap labour turmoil of the late 1800's and early 1900's.

Mr. Layton, Prime Minister Harper and others will find that reason explained in a 1907 Royal Commission Report which Mackenzie King did on why 11,440 Japanese, Chinese and East Indian workers had arrived at Vancouver and Victoria in 1907.

At that time, Mackenzie King was Deputy Minister of Labour and had just finished a Royal Commission report on compensation to the Japanese for the losses they had suffered during the September, 1907 Vancouver Riot.

King conducted his new inquiry in Vancouver and Victoria between Nov. 11 and 30, 1907. He interviewed 101 witnesses.

King's findings reveal a fascinating picture of that time and many similarities between 1907 and 2007.

King divided his report into three sections, one each for the Japanese, Chinese and East Indians. (This release deals with the largest section of King's report: his investigation of the Japanese.)

In trying to illustrate the Japanese Emperor's control, King observed that Japanese society was permeated by "a spirit of intense patriotism, a devotion to emperor and country, so profound as to constitute a religion". (P.4) The governors of Japan's prefectures (provinces) ensured that births, deaths, marriages, internal migration, etc. were rigorously tracked. In particular, emigration from Japan was carefully regulated.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 next








Tags:


    Comments

    Dan Murray Hello Brown

    By sane immigration, May 29, 2007 at 16:55

    Dan Murray

    Hello Brown Princess:

    The general historical point is that Japanese cheap labourers were entering Canada in large numbers in 1907 and displacing labourers already here. Many Canadian labourers had families to support and could not compete with the low wages that the Japanese were prepared to accept. The Japanese labourers were mostly single young men who came to Canada primarily to acquire enough money to buy land in Japan. After they had accumulated this money, they intended to leave Canada.

    Many labourers already here suffered from the Japanese inflow, as they had suffered from the cheap Chinese labourer inflow. A number were forced by these economic circumstances to leave British Columbia. Some went back to other parts of Canada and some left for the U.S.

    Here are a few additional things to remember:

    (1) The Japanese labourers who came here received wages 10 times higher than the wages they received in Japan.

    (2) The Chinese labourers who came here received wages 20 times the wages they received in China.

    (3) The East Indian labourers who came here received wages 50 times the wages they received in India.

    It should not have to be said that a country's immigration policy should be directed towards the benefit of its own people. Contrary to what a number of ethnic groups in Canada now seem to think, the staggering numbers of the poor in the world mean that immigration policy cannot possibly be used to solve poverty in other parts of the world.

    Here is a question for you:

    Could the Canadian labourers who lost their jobs to the cheap labourers who came here expect to go to Japan, China and India to get jobs? Obviously not.

    Canada enacted a law (requiring passengers to travel on ships which left the country of the passengers' origin) primarily in order to stop an inflow of Japanese cheap labour which had arrived here in 1907 from Hawaii (against the wishes of the Japanese government). Through talks with the Japanese government, it also tried to deal with a simultaneous, underhanded arrival of Japanese labourers from Japan. Both efforts were "Canadian Workers First" statements and they were intended to solve unemployment and poverty in Canada's own population.

    The people who assembled the labourers aboard the Komagata Maru were challenging the right of the Canadian government to look out for the interests of its own people. They received an appropriate response--the same that should have been offered by any other country to any group that tried to do something similar.

    passengers aboard the

    By BrownPrincess, May 22, 2007 at 15:53

    passengers aboard the Komagata Maru were refused entry into Canada because authorities and fellow residents wanted the country to remain "white" than what makes it right for them to go to the country of the indians that jewel the queen wears on her crown belongs to india all the whites did to india was rob it of its wealth so yeah i think Canada should apologize to passengers of the Komagata Maru for being two faced hypocrits

    Editor's Picks

    Darfur Refugees: Don't Press-Gang Our Sons

    By Citizen Correspondent Anna Schmitt
    Through my humanitarian work in Central Africa, I learned that refugee children from... Full Story »