Politicians And Their Words of Violence

It seems that they speak with a united ideology when public support for foreign policy is weakening - the politicians suddenly emerge from the shadows with their negative, unsubstantiated claims that terrorists are becoming stronger than ever before. President G.W. Bush brought Pakistan into the picture, yet again, accusing the Pakistani Government of not doing enough to assist the American campaign on terror. President Bush was the one who threatened Pakistani leader Musharaff ,"Be prepared to be bombed back into the stone ages if you do not assist the Allied war on terror."

Who does George Bush think he is? He is just another leader in this world, not a God nor a Marvel Comic-Strip Hero. 'Captain America and the Aggressors' use powerful provocative language via the media,
which is why things go from relatively benign to the paranoid-9/11-days.

Why do politicians rally toward violent talk when our countries are so peaceful in comparison to the Middle East and other troubled parts of the World? Why should we, the world public be subjected to politicians' words of promoting violence at a time when so much violence already dominates.Surely their sour words make the situation worse?

I will give my theory, which I can substantiate with evidence. I say that President Bush is part of a major ring of heavily-funded Defense Groups of America, who have holdings and production lines in Military Hardware. (The building and sales of weapons, vehicles and facilites for war, like tanks and bombs). Those U.S. Defense Groups are continuosly trying to keep their factory doors open, to keep the ball rolling in terms of production of these Arms and Services , to rake in the sales of those weapons to countries like Israel, Middle East countries and others.

For example, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was the same U.S.